Reflections Lost and the Missing Nightline Telegram

Ted Koppel on the tv set of Nightline

Is breaking news broken? Were telegrams more powerful than the instant communication we have now? Is there room for reflection? Maybe, yep, and I hope so.

Iran Hostage Crisis Births Nightline

On November 4th of 1979 fifty-three American diplomats and citizens were held hostage after a group of Iranian college students belonging to the Muslim Student Followers of the Imam’s Line took over the U.S. Embassy in Tehran and took them as hostages. The hostages were held for 444 days.

There was no CNN, FOX, or MSNBC. 24 hour news existed only on AM radio. But this story consumed America. ABC News tapped into it with British born and American raised news anchor, Ted Koppel at the helm. On November 8th, just 4 days after the hostages were taken, Nightline was broadcasting nightly updates. It was not breaking live news, it was a recap of the events to far. There was a moment to digest and understand what happened, where we were, and where we could go.

Nightline in the 80’s

After the crisis was over, Nightline would continue this format with a focus on one issue every night. Koppel and ABC were not perfect, but there was some important ground covered in the 80’s.

In a 1990 recap of the first decade of Nightline, EW showcased some of the most notable and important moments. There were ground breaking live interviews with Ferdinand Marcos, Archbishop Desmond Tutu, Indian Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi, and Kurt Waldheim. There were inquisitions of George HW Bush and Michael Dukakis during the ’88 campaign. Timed around the release of Nelson Mandela there was crucial coverage of South Africa. Relevant to today there was a special series called “Nightline in the Holy Land” which featured debates between Israelis and Palestinians.

Nightline was part of my life as my grandparents and my dad watched it almost every night.

Power of the Telegram

In the Summer of 1984 I was visiting my father in rural West Texas. One night we were watching Ted Koppel covering professional Chess. This was a topic that was very dear to my dad. He was a chess enthusiast. There was something Ted had said during the show that was factually incorrect.

My dad grabbed the phone and called Western Union. He dictated a short message to be delivered urgently to ABC studios by telegram. Think of a telegram as a hand delivered printed email that could arrive in minutes using wire services.

Before the end of the broadcast, Ted Koppel announced a correction of the detail they got wrong and acknowledged the telegram sent by a viewer. I was stunned and amazed that instant communication had the power to go from a home in West Texas to New York City and a network and anchor would listen. Now that power is available to us all.

A Father’s Concern and Reflection Lost

In the 90’s my father lived in Northern California. I was visiting him one Summer. After we finished watching an episode of Nightline together I asked him what his thoughts were on CNN and 24 hour news.

“I have concerns, son.”

I asked him what the concerns were.

“When I worked for the Trib, I always knew that news was a business as much as it is the first draft of history. But things are changing. Less papers have evening editions to recap and update.

With everything being breaking news in the 24/7 cycle, the local late night broadcasts are starting to change. Instead of recaps and reflection they are having to keep up with the change. Everything is breaking news and I fear it is breaking the news. We are so exhausted from the pace that there is less reflection. That is what Nightline and monthly news magazines offer. A recap. A moment to take a breath and reflect on what happened as opposed to always looking at what is happening now.

Without reflection we lose clarity on the moment.

Without reflection we may forget what we look like.”

Electronic Letters to the Editor

Between 2009 and 2013 I had a column in a local paper in the Chicago area. It started as an occasional column that swiftly become a regular monthly column in a weekly paper owned by 22nd Century Media.

In 600 words I touched nerves. My writing engaged some and enraged others on local social issues in the community. People wrote letters to the editor. The editor published those letters as they were written.

A conversation was happening. Papers were being sold and read. I was welcomed by the editor to continue writing my heart. Had it not been for the emails to the editor, I would not have been able to continue.

Gen X Watch Reflections

Journalism has many categories. I write Opinion/Editorials. I specifically write in a niche style called Gonzo Journalism. In Gonzo I am not objective and I insert myself into the story. I am sometimes coarse in my speech and position myself as a protagonist. But I take the research, ethics, and reflection seriously.

I have had decades to pause and reflect of the events of my youth and offer perspective that is relevant today. Race issues in early MTV relates to allies today. The history of Women’s History Month shows that it is tied into education as well as human and civil rights. The story on shopping malls ties into the importance of 3rd places and a public square accessible to all. Even the Subversive Art of Mixtapes uncovers the real world impact mixtapes had on the fall of communism and the rise of hip hop.

The Feminist Friday articles even tap into reflection. It is far more personal, but in the backdrop were things women I knew had to rise above and the voices that inspired them and changed me.

Relational Reflection

We can still write letters to the editor and engage in that relationship.

Western Union telegrams and a mailed letter cost money. An email or a thoughtful comment only costs a few moments of your time.

So take a few moments and drop a comment. Let’s have that relationship.

Support Gen X Watch!

There are four ways you can do this:

1. Share this story with a friend and leave a comment.

2. Tip me! I need your support!

3. Become a Members Only Patreon! In the Patreon I will have unfiltered rants, exclusive content, free PDF copies of the upcoming quarterly magazine, and more.

4. Go to our store and buy the print magazine! It is art, news, and nostalgia that matters!

Thank you for your support and taking the time to read this.

Stay Totally Awesome! Stay true to you.

11 responses to “Reflections Lost and the Missing Nightline Telegram”

  1. Scott Edwards Avatar
    Scott Edwards

    I’d agree that news organizations have lost sight of their primary purpose. They have put the business side ahead of the journalism side. In turn, this has directly affected how the public consumes and understands the news.

    In the article you mention a time when “There was no CNN, FOX, or MSNBC. 24 hour news existed only on AM radio.” I personally feel that was better. Today there are so many choices of when and where people can get news from that they never see anything that they don’t already agree with. They don’t learn about events, ideas, etc that they aren’t already familiar with. People are consciously choosing who they hear things from, and that limits their education and growth as people. In the days when we had no internet, no personal electronic devices, a couple of daily newspapers, and only three tv stations to choose from, we had no way of minimizing our own exposure to the rest of the world. “It’s a small world” could’ve been used in reference to how easily we would know about things happening on the other side of the globe. Today, “It’s a small world” can be used in reference to how limited people’s own awareness is of things outside their own fields of interest.

    1. Pat Green Avatar

      There is so much that you said here that has great insights. I’ve more thoughts to dovetail off of yours, but I need to chew, reflect, and ensure my response is as thoughtful and insightful as this comment. Thank you for reading and taking time to write! More to come this evening, but there is a day job to attend to.

  2. Rhonda Page Avatar
    Rhonda Page

    Scott Edwards, that was spot on. I think back to the late 70s and early 80s when our station was primarily CBS, and we got our news from Walter Cronkite. We were told the facts as they were covered by the reporters. We weren’t told what to think about them. We had to form our own opinions. The town of Wrightsville, GA came to national attention because of Walter Cronkite and reporters covering the KKK and racial protests. Many of my fellow Wrightsvillians doubled down on bigotry or dismissed “them folks from California and New York,” coming to town to protest against the KKK and for the civil rights of black folks. They were dismissed because they didn’t know “how we do things here.” I can’t articulate the evolution of society, but even then and there, change happened. The 1977 World Book Encyclopedia had a picture of our town square in their coverage of the KKK. New generations have come, and the Klan went into hiding for a while. They’re back. They’re MAGA. I’m not sure how we will come out this time with folks in their own “news” bubbles. There always another take on the news with “alternative facts.” At our house, we miss having actual facts. We wish opinions were still relegated to the editorial sections. Today, we question the news and usually don’t know what’s actually happening. We just know what they said.

    1. Pat Green Avatar

      More on that as well. Agree with much of what you two say, but as an insider view a lot of place goes to journalism that is actually we the people which you touch on very well.

  3. Sue Thomas Avatar
    Sue Thomas

    Much of journalism here in Australia is very much as you have described. 24 hour “breaking news”. If there are interviews to supposedly learn more, it seems journalists are always trying to trip up the interviewee to get what I call a “gotcha moment”. Or the interviewee, usually a politician, refuses to answer the question and just trots out the party line. We do have a couple of exceptions on our public broadcaster. One is QandA – where questions from the general public are posed to a 5 member panel. Now there is probably some bias in the questions that are chosen, but generally they are about current events. The panel unfortunately usually has at least 2 politicians on it but usually also thinkers from other fields. It allows for differing views to be put and pondered upon. The other is a show called Insights and has a topic for the week and various people with personal experience or expertise in that topic share their views and experiences. I rarely watch the straight news stuff now because, as you describe, it feels like I’m being bombarded with way too much, mostly sensationalist and designed to create fear. A population in fear is easier to control and manipulate. But I hang on to the 2 outliers and hope they don’t get lost in the mess that is commercial “news”.

  4. Pat Green Avatar

    I want to sincerely thank everyone for the comments so far. I am being careful in my response to ensure I do not make anyone feel they are called out. As I read and ponder the 3 replies I had to pause and chew.

    ***PART 1-We the people***

    The first thing I want to cover is our responsibility as citizens. To be informed is a conscious choice. When we were young and bought a paper it had sections. At the minimum it is national/international news, local news, sports, entertainment/amusements, classified advertisements, and neighborhood news. Editorials usually appear in the first section of the paper, although some newspapers have a separate section devoted just to insights and opinion. We also had to vet our news. If at the news stand in the 80s or 90s it was easy to spot the difference between the National Inquirer and the Ney York Times. Maybe it is not as obvious online, but there are may resources that can easily be googled that will let you know the bias and accuracy of a news source.

    In op/ed, confirmation bias is welcome in my opinion. In the hard news you need it to be accurate.

    My point is that it takes intention to make sure that one is ensuring the source they are getting it from is legitimate and a little diversity and intention in the “sections” can help us be more informed.

  5. Pat Green Avatar

    I want to sincerely thank everyone for the comments so far. I am being careful in my response to ensure I do not make anyone feel they are called out. As I read and ponder the 3 replies I had to pause and chew.

    PART 2-The Media. Most journalists and editors take their job and responsibility seriously. But I do agree that Fox and MSNBC are dangerous to critical thought. They oft report news with slant so they can reference it later and the line between hard news and op/ed is blurred. My fear is how those bad players are painted to be all of “corporate media”. It is amazing how if you put the word corporate or big before something it suddenly becomes evil and bad.

    But like my dad did with a telegram, we have the ability to do with emails and comments at no charge. We can hold them accountable and if we have done our due work we have that right. And the editors and journalists who take their responsibility seriously will take it to heart because they want to make sure they got the story right.

    As far as the MSNBC and the Fox….when you see their hyperbole…pretend you at the news stand in 1986 and you just saw the cover story of a paper state that Margaret Thatcher is really an alien and the bat Ozzy bit is still alive.

  6. Pat Green Avatar

    I want to sincerely thank everyone for the comments so far. I am being careful in my response to ensure I do not make anyone feel they are called out. As I read and ponder the 3 replies I had to pause and chew.

    PART 3-We need Journalism and it is a tough gig.

    Since the pandemic I have done some freelance gigs in the city of Chicago. I have had a men get in my face and two cars aim at me and some interactions with police that were dystopian. In America, that should make our blood run cold.

    Journalism is the 4th pillar of the state and the first draft of history. There is a reason why a free press is defended in the constitution. Without newspapers, radio shows, blogs, etc, the average person would have little to no knowledge of what’s going on around them. Most people lack the time and resources to investigate issues and stories that affect them and their communities. This is what a journalist is trained to do and does it every day. On average, even in my op ed, there is 3-5 hours of researching and fact checking before I write anything. Fact-checking is a vital element of a free press. If the press is not able to fact-check safely and effectively, the truth remains buried.

    We hold power accountable and are an essential part to free and fair elections. Accountability is something that power does not like. This is bi partisan. That may be why in Gaza somewhere around 100 journalists are dead in Ukraine we have lost at least 17. And in both cases I know some of the ones who died.

    But lets bring that closer to home. Since George Floyd, things have been bad for reporters in the US. Over 1,323 incidents have been recorded. These include unlawful arrests, assults by police officers and politicians, and other abuses. That is a lot of risk and passion for $14,878 a year in illinois for the average freelancer on the streets with a degree and certs to do this for a living. And we complain about a $3 a week “paywall”. If we want something to have value…are we wiling to partner with it ?

    That is not a question I can answer for others.

    1. Sue Thomas Avatar
      Sue Thomas

      I agree there are some great journalists out there who research their stories and don’t let interviewees get away with fluffy nonsense responses to questions. In Australia most of these work for the public broadcaster or are freelance and their work is mostly shown by the public broadcaster. However there are a growing number who work on the commercial channels who are there purely to toe the line of whomever owns their media outlet and not to upset those who advertise and bring in the $$. They are there to sensationalise us with breaking news and so called “exclusive” stories. They don’t challenge the interviewees when they give crap answers to their questions and reproduce stories from other outlets without doing due diligence to make sure there is some factual basis for the story. They do us and their industry a serious disservice. It started when media moguls like Rupert Murdoch were allowed to monopolise multiple media outlets and control the narrative and the careers of any journalist who dares to push the boundaries.

      I do agree that we the public need to be discerning and do some fact checking ourselves but so many do not, especially if the journalist do not themselves challenge some of their interviewees. It is seen as whatever is said must be true because the journalist apparently accepted it as so.

  7. Briala Avatar
    Briala

    Your story about the telegram reminded me of another similar story.

    Our national broadcaster had a news anchor who had been on-air for a very long time and was thus very well known in Australia. In his autobiography, he relates stories where he would get phone calls from the public after a news broadcast was over! It was apparently policy at the time that if you asked for someone by name when you called, you would get put through – no matter who they were. I don’t think they would allow that anymore…

    1. Pat Green Avatar

      In the US we had zone billing for telephone calls. Local was divided into zone a, b and c. Once you got outside that it was long distance. The further away the more expensive the call. I wonder if that was how it was in your corner of the world. Like my dad’s telegram, you would have to be invested in the process.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *